Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Smoking Saves Money
Insight ^ | 11/15/02 | James Lacey

Posted on 11/15/2002 9:33:16 AM PST by Jean S

Self-appointed watchdogs of our health and well-being have approached the elimination of tobacco from our daily lives with crusading zeal. Continual efforts to ban smoking in every public nook and cranny have forced smokers to behave akin to medieval lepers. It would be interesting to know the productivity cost of smokers deserting their jobs to gather furtively in dark corners beyond the reach of the antismoking zealots. Thrown together with the savings caused by smokers' pronounced tendency to die off early (therefore no longer needing expensive senior care), there probably is a decent argument that society would realize a large fiscal gain by encouraging smoking.

However, this type of cost-benefit analysis is not the strong suit of professional zealots. So, it is no real wonder that they completely missed the massive health costs that increased tobacco taxes and huge settlements have inflicted on the public they have sworn to save. As every smoker or person even associated with a smoker knows, when you quit smoking you gain weight. Common sense makes the reason obvious and we will not dwell on it now. What has not been missing is the cost of this increased caloric consumption.

A new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research lays out some of the costs of increasing tobacco prices. The zealots have run smack into the law of unintended consequences. According to the study, every 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes leads directly to a 2 percent rise in the number of obese people. Between 1980 and 2001 the real price of cigarettes increased 164 percent. In that same period the number of obese people increased by 50 percent. Public-health professionals say privately that this massive increase can be traced back to the effects of higher cigarette prices, though fast food and changed working habits also were major contributors.

The problem is that the health effects of obesity far outweigh the negative effects of smoking. Two Rand researchers, health economist Roland Sturm and psychiatrist Kenneth Wells, examined the comparative effects of obesity, smoking, heavy drinking and poverty on chronic health conditions and health expenditures. Their finding: Obesity is the most serious problem. It is linked to a big increase in chronic health conditions and significantly higher health expenditures. And it affects more people than smoking, heavy drinking or poverty.

Early deaths caused by obesity already are well over 300,000 annually, and are growing. Obesity-related health-care costs have grown to over $100 billion a year and now consume over 6 percent of all health-care spending.

Of course the zealots have a ready answer for all of this: Just add a little more social engineering and everything will be okay. All we have to do now is take all the smokers who no longer can afford their vice of choice and force them to eat healthily. The great legal tort machine, well funded by tobacco settlements, already is gearing up for this new effort.

Look for a lot more lawsuits filed against McDonald's and Burger King as the zealots try to make us all better people.

James Lacey is a colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve and a New York-based columnist with expertise in finance and military affairs.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obesity; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2002 9:33:16 AM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
... there probably is a decent argument that society would realize a large fiscal gain by encouraging smoking.

Exactly, nothing generates revenue like Emphysema, throat cancer, lung cancer, mouth cancer, excessive sick days; and sore throats. Plus, smelling stale smoke at your desk is certainly a huge incentive for smokers and non-smokers alike to stay longer and work harder. What's the next big article? The financial benefits of suicide, arsnic and heroin?

2 posted on 11/15/2002 9:38:26 AM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Those who habitually spew their anti-smoking rants here on FR, ought state their weights. I'm a heavy smoker. 5'10", 168 pounds. Last visited a doctor, for other than sewing or broken bones, over forty years ago. I've smoked heavily for longer than that.
3 posted on 11/15/2002 9:41:17 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Are you fat?
4 posted on 11/15/2002 9:42:34 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Anti-smoking "fanatics believe that their actions are inherently 'good', even as they trample the rights, dignity and lives of those they wish to 'save'".

Look familiar?
5 posted on 11/15/2002 9:44:03 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *puff_list
Bump.
6 posted on 11/15/2002 9:51:29 AM PST by Grit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; maxwell; ...
Put a sock in it!
7 posted on 11/15/2002 9:54:06 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
There is a big difference between limiting YOUR right to smoke and permitting me to breathe. I cannot escape a smokers stench in my office, or at a resturant (I have to be at work, or I have to eat). A smoker can take his habit elsewhere to stink up the place, and hurt himself. I used to smoke 1.5 packs/day of Marlboro Red (hardpack, please). I got tired of walking outside to smoke, the sore throats and paying through the nose. So, I quit; and after smoking for 10+ yrs, I can tell you it's not easy .... but I did. As to whether I'm fat or not.... I'm actually not fat at all. I could stand to lose a few pounds, for for a 6ft tall man, 220 isn't obese.
8 posted on 11/15/2002 9:55:02 AM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Over 41% of all deaths nationally are attributable to heart disease. The major cause of heart disease is obesity, and high "fat" diet, or if you will a behavioral choice. If soaking the taxpayer for the consequences of peoples "behavioral choices" is too much (ie: smokers, driving without seatbelts, not wearing a helmet on motorcycles), and yet fat people are costing us more money, why not the exorbitant lawsuits against candybar makers?
Additionally, I would rather look at smokers than at huge, gross, and obese people cramming their pie holes with more food, as I foot the bill for their subsequent nursing home costs when they can't walk more than 30 steps without a walker.
Smokers rule, fatties suck, people that attempt to regulate and enforce safety suck the worst.
Give me liberty or give me death... yeah, and a pack of Lucky's. Keep the twinkie.
9 posted on 11/15/2002 9:56:39 AM PST by AngryOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The calculations probably work better in a country with a greater welfare state, like, erm, Britain. If people smoke, they pay massive taxes into the Treasury. If they die sooner, they cost less in terms of long term care, pensions and retirement homes.

In effect, thanks to socialism, the government has an incentive for us to die as soon as we stop being good little taxpayers and actually want to draw on what we've paid.

Regards, Ivan

10 posted on 11/15/2002 9:57:34 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Are you ugly? There is a difference between a person who is overweight or even obese (Why do you think Nutrition is a doctoriate program?) and a person who is addicted to a drug. Nicotine is a drug.

The issue at hand is that smokers tend to make up the lower income of population, yet tend to have a higher than average incidence of heart, liver, lung, throat and mouth ailments.

To encourage this habit, as this article does; it as thoughtless as espousing the virtues of heroin, LSD, and body mutilation. Smoking is self-distructive, anyone who can read the Surgeon Generals warning should recognize this fact.
11 posted on 11/15/2002 9:58:43 AM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS
New Law Seeks to Reduce Obesity

21 September 2002

Low fat New Yorkers might be healthier for the state budget. This week, the governor signed the Obesity Prevention Act into law. It asks the Health Department to find ways to help New Yorkers get healthier, reduce obesity and cut the cost to the state.

(What's next?  They said the same thing about smoking!)

click here

Studies:  Obesity Worse Than Tobacco Smoking

OBESITY LINKED TO HIGHER RATES OF CHRONIC ILLNESS AND WORSE PHYSICAL
QUALITY OF LIFE THAN SMOKING, DRINKING OR POVERTY
THREE OF FIVE ADULT AMERICANS ARE OVERWEIGHT OR OBESE

Study by RAND

"with worse physical health-related quality of life than are lifetime smoking, problem drinking or poverty."

Couch potato lifestyle is worse for your health than smoking

Poor diet and lack of exercise cause more illness than smoking, new figures show.

article here

Surgeon general warns obesity may overtake tobacco as leading preventable killer

click here

Hospitals challenged by obese patients

The Charleston Post and Courier | July 28, 2002 |

"They put a towel over my incision so I could squeeze through the doorway," Sightler said.

With the growing obesity epidemic, how can hospitals better accommodate severely overweight patients?

."It's beginning to be an issue everywhere. The rate of obesity is skyrocketing," said Dr. Patrick O'Neil, director of MUSC's Weight Management Center.

story here

13 posted on 11/15/2002 10:03:15 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
LOL !!
14 posted on 11/15/2002 10:04:03 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngryOne
I do not question the fact that FAT is a killer. Being overweight is not good for your health. However, are you also aware of: Insulin Resistance, carb addiction, and cultural issues that impact weight? Diabetes is commonplace, where it used to be rare. Medical science is constantly showing that obese people are seldom to blame for their weight. Doesn't make sense, but it's true. Some people are blessed with enzymes that aid in weight control, while others are not. Fat people are constantly hungry, and the fatter they get, the hungrier they feel.

Smoking on the other hand, is a laxitive as well as a metobolic booster. I never had a weight problem while I was smoking. The fact that nicotine was causing my metabolism to work faster kept me trim. Now I don't smoke, and like most smokers who quit; I put on some weight. However, I quit smoking, and have lost 40 lbs so far.

Let's be intellectually honest. Smoking is a habit, like a junkie and his needle. It has practically no benefits, it is self-distructive, it's known to cause cancer ... why do that to your self or your loved ones?
15 posted on 11/15/2002 10:04:53 AM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
The issue at hand is that smokers tend to make up the lower income of population, yet tend to have a higher than average incidence of heart, liver, lung, throat and mouth ailments.

Kiss my White American butt you uneducated boob!

16 posted on 11/15/2002 10:05:59 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Those who habitually spew their anti-smoking rants here on FR, ought state their weights.

I'm with you.

5'10", 168 pounds.

5'10", 120 pounds.

Last visited a doctor, for other than sewing or broken bones, over forty years ago.

I do go for annual ob-gyn exams - but other than that, it's been over 20 years for me and I've been smoking longer than that.

17 posted on 11/15/2002 10:06:30 AM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Let's TAX the FAT!


18 posted on 11/15/2002 10:07:35 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Nicotine is a drug.

so is caffeine........so your point is.......what???????

19 posted on 11/15/2002 10:09:44 AM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I cannot escape a smokers stench in my office, or at a resturant (I have to be at work, or I have to eat)

You certainly don't have to eat at restaurants which allow smoking. You want your personal preferences to trump the rights of property owners, which is a core belief of the left. (And no, I don't smoke).

20 posted on 11/15/2002 10:10:47 AM PST by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson